Legal Opinion

Foley v. Schmidt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 8, 1924No. 25,086PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J.:

The action was one to enforce specific performance of a contract for the purchase of a gas and mineral lease or to recover $4,000 if the defendant refused to carry out the terms of his contract of purchase. Trial was to the court. The plaintiff prevailed and defendant appeals.

The controversy involved the sale and assignment of what may be termed the “Island lease.” The “island” is in the Neosho river, in Neosho county, eleven miles northeast of Parsons. It was owned by the heirs of the late R. N. Allen, of Chanute. The testimony showed that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rose v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  2. Brooks v. WeikSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. Consolidated Barb-Wire Co. v. PurcellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kee v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API