Legal Opinion

Consolidated Barb-Wire Co. v. Purcell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Chautauqua District Court. Action by the Company against McGuire and another on a certain check. Attachment was issued. Purcdl inter-pleaded, claiming an interest in the property attached. Verdict and judgment for the interpleader. The plaintiff comes to this court. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Simpson, C.:

On the 10th day of January, 1889, the Consolidated Barb-Wire Company commenced an action in the district court of Chautauqua county against A. J. and W. E. McGuire, on a protested check drawn by the McGuire Bros, on the Commercial Bank, of Independence, Kas., in favor of the barb-wire company, for $293.40, protest fees, interest, and costs. An attachment was caused to be issued, and levied on horses, cows, a two-horse buggy, a stack of hay and other property of the McGuire Bros. This levy was made on the 10th day of January, the same day that the suit was commenced and…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Foley v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  2. Kee v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API