Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Attorney General v. Bay County Bridge Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Mandamus by the people, on the relation of Fred A. Maynard, attorney general, to compel the Bay county bridge commission to keep in repair the approach to a certain bridge.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is a proceeding brought to determine who should keep in repair that portion of the approach to the Third-Street Bridge across Saginaw river which lies between the west end of the bridge and the east end of the cedar-block pavement on Midland street, in West Bay City, Mich. It is -claimed by the relator that it is the duty of the respondent to do so, while the respondent claims that it is not its duty to keep that portion of the street in repair lying between the east end of the cedar-block pavement on Midland street and the west end of the cobble-stone pavement lying west of the west end…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shaw v. Township of SalineMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scharman v. Bay County Bridge CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Attorney General v. Fort Street Union Depot Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Dietrich v. SchremmsMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API