Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Miami Valley Broadcasting Corp. v. Kessler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1980No. 80-1352PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue presented is whether relators have the right to notice of the hearings on the trial coverage together with the right to play a meaningful role at those hearings. Due to the recent advent of the allowance of broad*167cast coverage of trials in Ohio and the experimental nature of our rules on such coverage, this is an issue of first impression for this court. This action has brought to our attention a possible deficiency in our rules.

Recently, in State, ex rel. Grinnell Communications Corp., v. Love (1980), 62 Ohio St. 2d 399, this court discussed Sup. R. 11 and Canon 3A(7) of the Code of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Grinnell Communications Corp. v. LoveOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Joseph Hutchison v. R.C. Marshall, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  2. State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. Geauga County Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. LiasOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Plain Dealer Publishing Co. v. Geauga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, Juv. Div.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State Ex Rel. Cosmos Broadcasting Corp. v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API