Legal Opinion

Joseph Hutchison v. R.C. Marshall, Superintendent

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 28, 1984No. 83-3890PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

This post-conviction, habeas corpus action raises questions regarding rights and remedies available to the criminal defendant whose trial is delayed against his wishes while television stations attempt through appellate review to obtain the right to televise his trial. Reserving judgment on the issue of pretrial habeas corpus relief in such cases, a question not before us, we hold that post-conviction relief is not appropriate in this case.

I

Petitioner, Joseph Hutchison, was indicted by an Ohio grand jury on May 27, 1980, for aggravated burglary, felonious assault and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Robert Lee Norris v. James Schotten, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. Fernando Lopez v. Julius Wilson, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  3. Danta Davis v. Dennis Straub, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. John Wesley Duffel v. Michael Dutton, Warden, Tennessee State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  5. Mumin Israfil v. Harry K. Russell, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API