Lemay Bank and Trust Co. v. Harper
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARD, Presiding Judge.
Defendants appeal from a summary judgment against them as a result of their personal guaranty of promissory notes executed by Realistic Development, Inc. The guaranty was a continuing one. Defendants contend that there remain issues of fact to be determined; therefore plaintiff is not entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. We affirm.
From the record we learn that defendants Harold Harper and James Jokerst were the shareholders and officers of a now bankrupt corporation, Realistic Development, Inc. Each owned 50% of the stock of this corporation. The corporation…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Edwards v. HeidelbaughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Centerre Bank of Kansas City, N.A. v. Distributors, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- Hayes v. HatfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Boatmen's Bank of Jefferson County v. Community Interiors, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Signature Pool & Court v. City of ManchesterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. Citizens National Bank of Fort ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Frame v. Boatmen's Bank of Concord VillageMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Ulreich v. KreutzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
- Landmark Bank of St. Charles County v. SaetteleDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1992
- Richardson v. RohrbaughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.