Legal Opinion

Lemay Bank and Trust Co. v. Harper

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1991No. 58759PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Presiding Judge.

Defendants appeal from a summary judgment against them as a result of their personal guaranty of promissory notes executed by Realistic Development, Inc. The guaranty was a continuing one. Defendants contend that there remain issues of fact to be determined; therefore plaintiff is not entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. We affirm.

From the record we learn that defendants Harold Harper and James Jokerst were the shareholders and officers of a now bankrupt corporation, Realistic Development, Inc. Each owned 50% of the stock of this corporation. The corporation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Edwards v. HeidelbaughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Centerre Bank of Kansas City, N.A. v. Distributors, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Hayes v. HatfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Boatmen's Bank of Jefferson County v. Community Interiors, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Signature Pool & Court v. City of ManchesterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. Citizens National Bank of Fort ScottMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Frame v. Boatmen's Bank of Concord VillageMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Ulreich v. KreutzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Landmark Bank of St. Charles County v. SaetteleDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1992
  5. Richardson v. RohrbaughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API