Legal Opinion

People v. Romero

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 17, 1972No. 24840PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Groves

In a trial to the court the defendants were convicted under our statute which provides:

“Every person who shall enter without breaking any motor vehicle, with the intent to commit the crime of theft and steals therefrom money, goods, or other valuable thing, shall be deemed guilty of a felony . .. .” 1967 Perm. Supp., C.R.S. 1963,40-5-10(2).

The goods stolen were a saddle, saddle pad and bridle.

Mary Kimble, aged 15, had two horses and desired to purchase a saddle. On the morning of February 19, 1970 she communicated this information to the defendants, one of whom told her that he “would try and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Noble v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  2. Smith v. First Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Kimmel v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  4. Wilcox v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Richardson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  2. State v. RodriguezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. FreyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  4. People v. JiminezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  5. Hunt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API