Legal Opinion
Burkhardt v. Bates
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided February 24, 1961No. Civ. 926PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRAVEN, District Judge.
In the present case, the defendants have filed a motion in two Divisions. While the motion is not so specifically designated, it is in reality a motion for summary judgment founded upon the ground that the plaintiff’s claim against the defendants is barred by the applicable statute of limitation and it was and is so treated by the Court. Jurisdiction in this case is based on diversity of citizenship.
On November 18,1960, the plaintiff filed her complaint in this action in this Court. The statements next set forth in this paragraph are those contained in that complaint.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ragan v. Merchants Transfer & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Gardner v. BeckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Kokenge v. HolthausSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
- Citizens Bank of Pleasantville v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Fernekes & Bros. v. CaseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Mabel Groninger v. Merrill E. DavisonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Tarter v. InscoWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
- Lucille Burkhardt v. James Bates and Janney Semple Hill & Co., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- Barrett v. BurtDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1966
- Williams v. Vick Chemical CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1967
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.