Legal Opinion
Williams v. Vick Chemical Company
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided September 28, 1967No. Civ. 3-734-DPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
STEPHENSON, Chief Judge.
This matter is now before the Court on the motions of both defendants to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12. Each defendant moves to dismiss on the grounds that (1) the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, (2) the Court has no jurisdiction of the subject matter, (3) the action is barred by the Statute of Limitations for matters of this type as set forth in the Iowa Code. Defendants further move to dismiss, or in lieu thereof, to quash the return of service on the grounds, (1) plaintiff has failed to follow…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Arthur H. Aftanase v. Economy Baler Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Chrischilles v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Tice v. Wilmington Chemical CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Eyerly Aircraft Co. v. Jack Killian, Individually and for and on Behalf of Jan Killian, a MinorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Block Industries, a Corporation v. Dhj Industries, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
- Molina Avilés v. Supermercado Amigo, Inc.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1987
- Kerrigan v. Clarke Gravely Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Dirksen v. Hynes & Howes Ins. Counselors, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.