Legal Opinion

Maples v. McDonald

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 9, 1995No. 2940536PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Joe Maples and Clinton Aden (taxpayers) filed a class action against several retailers to recover an overpayment of sales taxes on beer, wine, and tobacco products. The taxpayers alleged that the retailers had applied the sales tax on the retail price of the products including the excise taxes placed on these products and that that practice constituted illegal "double" taxation. As a result of a settlement agreement, the taxpayers and the retailers filed a joint petition for a refund for excess payment of taxes with the Department of Revenue. The Department denied the refund petitions, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Young v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
  2. United States v. DarusmontSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Capital Alliance Ins. v. Thorough-CleanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  4. Lindsay v. United States Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  5. B.R.O. v. G.C.O.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Monroe v. Valhalla Cemetery Company, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  2. Opinion of the Justices No. 380Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  3. Smith v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API