Legal Opinion

Singapore Ministry of Health v. Farrera-Brochez

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided November 25, 2019No. 5:19-cv-00051Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY CENTRAL DIVISION (at Lexington) SINGAPORE MINISTRY OF HEALTH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 5: 19-051-DCR ) V. ) ) MIKHY K. FARRERA-BROCHEZ, ) MEMORANDUM OPINION ) AND ORDER Defendant. ) *** *** *** *** Plaintiff Singapore Ministry of Health (“MOH”) has filed a motion for summary judgment and entry of a permanent injunction to prevent Defendant Mikhy Farrera-Brochez (“Brochez”) and his agents from making further attempts to obtain or disclose confidential information wrongfully obtained from the Government of Singapore. [Record No.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Philip D. Overstreet v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API