Legal Opinion

BUNDAY v. WALSH

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 9, 2022No. 2:13-cv-03437Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NATHANIEL BUNDAY, : CIVIL ACTION Petitioner, : : v. : No. 13-3437 : JEROME WALSH, et al., : Respondents. : MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD A. LLORET May 9, 2022 U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Before me is Nathaniel Bunday’s amended petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, which has been referred to me for a report and recommendation. Doc. Nos. 43, 46. Mr. Bunday raises five claims challenging his sentence of twenty-eight years to life imprisonment. Doc. Nos. 1, 18, 19. The Commonwealth argues that Mr.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Gonzalez v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Baldwin v. ReeseSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Leamer v. FauverCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API