Legal Opinion

Coughran v. Gilman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 27, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Hardin District Court. — IIon. S. M. Weaver, Judge. This is an action at law, founded upon a judgment rendered against the defendant in tlie district court in and for Yankton county, Second Judicial District of Dakota territory. There was a trial by the court, and a judgment for plaintiffs. The defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtRiOTHROOK, C. J.

1. action on menu juris® donee.’ T. The cause has once before been in this court. 72 Iowa, 570. On the former trial there was a judgment for the defendant, That judgment was reversed by this court-On the last trial there was a judgment for the plaintiff. We need not set out the record of the judgment of the district court in Dakota. It will be found set out in full in our former opinion. It is averred in the petition that the court in which the judgment was rendered was a court of general jurisdiction in the territory of Dakota. The answer contains a general denial of the averments of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Caughran v. GilmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Engelhard v. WeberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1899
  3. Hills Savings Bank v. CressSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Christiansen v. KrieselWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API