Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Carillion

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 22, 1988No. 275PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This appeal is taken by the Commonjvealth of Pennsylvania from an order granting appellee a new trial after appellee’s conviction for multiple counts of indecent assault, indecent exposure, corruption of a minor, statutory rape, involuntary deviate sexual intercourse and other related offenses committed upon a ten year old female victim.

The Commonwealth argues that appellee’s non-accessibility to the entire Lawrence County Children’s Services (Children’s Services) file pertaining to the victim does not warrant the grant of a new trial here. Specifically, the question for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SantiagoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Texaco, Inc. v. Dominguez, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1991
  3. Commonwealth v. HigbySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. BergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API