Legal Opinion
Hiney v. Teachers' Retirement Board
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1944PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.
The petitioner herein, administratrix of the estate of James E. Hiney, deceased, seeks an order under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act compelling the Teachers’ Retirement Board to pay petitioner the sum of $4,378.77, being the amount of the accumulated deductions and interest, made from his salary while in the employ of the Board of Education as a teacher.
Deceased contributed to and was a member of the Teachers’ Retirement System from September 1, 1927. In February, 1943, the Board of Education, pursuant to the provisions of section B20-42.0 of chapter 20 of the Administrative Code (L.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Woodworth v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Katz v. New York City Teachers' Retirement BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Woodworth v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
3Cited by1 opinion
- Estate of Benton Louis Snyder, Corn Exch. Bank Trust Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945