Legal Opinion

Oro v. Garell

United States District Court

Decided January 17, 1980PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONNOR, J. D. C.

This matter involving certain contractual disputes was settled pursuant to stipulation of the parties. As part of that stipulation the entitlement of plaintiff to recover counsel fees from defendants Garell was left to the court’s determination, it having been agreed that any obligation for counsel fees would be borne by the Garells.

The claimed obligation to pay counsel fees arises out of paragraph three of a promissory note dated December 7, 1977. That paragraph reads as follows:

The attachment of credits or property of the undersigned or of any such endorser or guarantor with…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Fair Lawn Dairies, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  2. Nieves v. BaranNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bomse v. MullinNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
  2. Lettenmaier v. Lube Connection, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API