Legal Opinion
Bomse v. Mullin
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 31, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
183 N.J. Super. 431 (1982)
444 A.2d 73
EMANUEL M. BOMSE AND MARGUERITE D. BOMSE, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
NEIL MULLIN, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Submitted March 18, 1982.
Decided March 31, 1982.
Before Judges FRITZ, ARD and TRAUTWEIN.
Balk, Goldberger, Mandell, Seligsohn & O'Connor, for plaintiffs (Louis David Balk on the brief).
Neil Mullin, defendant, pro se.
2Per curiam
The novel question raised by defendant's motion for leave to appeal in this matter is whether the subject matter jurisdiction of the county district court, limited to $5,000 exclusive of costs (N.J.S.A. 2A:6-34(a)),…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Wm. Blanchard Co. v. Beach Concrete Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- State v. MaddenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972
- Ajamian v. SchlangerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- City of Clifton v. Passaic County Board of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- W. KINGSLEY v. Wes Outdoor Advertising Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- State v. SciosciaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Lombardi v. MarzulliNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- State v. RoughtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987