Legal Opinion

Hurley v. Hurley

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 16, 1889PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This is a petition for partition. In 1870, the petitioner, Thomas Hurley, inherited one undivided half of the premises from his mother, subject to his father’s tenancy by the curtesy. On November 14, 1879, the father died, and the other half, which had belonged to him under a separate conveyance, descended to the petitioner and the respondents, two sons of the father by a former'wife. On September 8, 1879, before the father’s death, the premises were sold for taxes to one Capen. On December 6, 1880, the respondent, Daniel T. Hurley, paid Capen the amount necessary to redeem the premises, and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Van Horne v. FondaNew York Court of Chancery · 1821
  2. Choteau v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 1849
  3. Rothwell v. DeweesSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  4. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. BulteMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Lacey v. Davis & McFarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1856

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Harris v. LloydMontana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Solis v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Kerse v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  4. Barnes v. BoardmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  5. Roll v. EverettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API