Legal Opinion

United States v. Ohio Barge Lines, Inc., in Personam and M/v Steel Forwarder, Her Engines, Tackle, Appurtenances, Etc., in Rem v. John Doe, Richard Roe, Abc, Inc. And Xyz Co., in Personam, and the Vessels, Tackle and Appurtenances, Jane Doe and Mary Roe, in Rem, Third Party Ohio Barge Line, Inc., and the M/v Steel Forwarder, Her Engines, Tackle, Etc., in Rem

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 22, 1979No. 78-2630Published

1Opinion of the Court

607 F.2d 624

UNITED STATES of America

v.

OHIO BARGE LINES, INC., in personam and M/V STEEL FORWARDER,

her engines, tackle, appurtenances, etc., in rem,

v.

John DOE, Richard Roe, ABC, Inc. and XYZ Co., in personam,

and the Vessels, Tackle and Appurtenances, Jane

Doe and Mary Roe, in rem, Third Party Defendants,

Ohio Barge Line, Inc., and the M/V Steel Forwarder, her

engines, tackle, etc., in rem, Appellants.

No. 78-2630.

United States Court of Appeals,

Third Circuit.

Argued Sept. 6, 1979.

Decided Oct. 22, 1979.

Wayne L. Emery (argued), Richard J. Munsch, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellants.

Barbara Allen Babcock,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. Wyandotte Transportation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. United States v. Republic Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Ash Sheep Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API