Legal Opinion

In re United States

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided October 17, 2007No. Misc. Case No. H-07-613PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*412MEMORANDUM AND OPINION

LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge.

The United States of America has filed two ex parte applications for orders authorizing the installation and use of a pen register and trap-and-trace device. The magistrate judge granted the Government’s requests in part and denied them in part. Specifically, Magistrate Judge Smith granted the request for a pen register and trap-and trace device but denied access to cell-site information and post-cut-through dialed digits.1 Magistrate judges and district judges have divided over the Government’s ability to obtain such data by way of a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. In Re Application for Pen Register & Trap/Trace Device With Cell Site Location AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
  4. In Re the United States for an Order Authorizing the Use of a Pen Register & a Trap & Trace DeviceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2005
  5. In Re the United States for Orders Pursuant to Title 18District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the United States for an Order Authorizing the Installation & Use of a Pen Register & Trap & Trace DeviceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
  2. In Re USDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API