Legal Opinion
Chao v. Malkani
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided June 22, 2006No. 05-1654PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge TRAXLER and Judge GREGORY joined.
WILKINSON, Circuit Judge.
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (2000), safeguards the assets of employee benefit plans by setting forth standards of conduct for fiduciaries who have discretionary authority over such plans. In this case, the district court held that defendant plan fiduciaries breached their fiduciary duties. The court removed them as fiduciaries of the plan, and required them to remunerate it for the losses that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement v. Dillingham Construction, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension Fund v. Central Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Boggs v. BoggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Korotynska v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Solis v. Consulting Fiduciaries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Solis v. MalkaniCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- Chao v. MalkaniCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
- Malkani v. Clark Consulting, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.