Legal Opinion

Mayer v. Klug

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1919PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error: Court of Appeals for Hamilton county.

1Opinion of the CourtCushing, J.

Otto Klug brought suit against The Cincinnati Traction Company and Charles F. Mayer in the superior court. He charged that an automobile owned and operated by Mayer collided with a street car of the traction company; that he was a passenger on said car and was injured by-being thrown to the street as a result of the collision, due to the negligence of both defendants. Defendant Mayer answered the petition, denying-negligence, and filed a counterclaim against the traction -company. Klug moved to strike the -counterclaim from the answer and cross-petition. The motion was granted. Error is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. The New-York and New Haven R.R. v. . Schuyler, Cross, C.New York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Wiles v. . SuydamNew York Court of Appeals · 1876

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Dombalian v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. Price v. Kobacker Furniture Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1925
  3. Aldrich v. FriedmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. State v. SchottensteinCincinnati Municipal Court · 1963
  5. Sylvester v. EvansOhio Court of Appeals · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API