Legal Opinion

Grant v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 4, 1987No. 52616PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAROHL, Judge.

Movant appeals denial of Rule 27.26 post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. The claim of error is movant “demonstrated by a preponderance of the evidence that he was denied effective assistance of trial counsel” for failure to interview and call two witnesses, James Riggins and Willie Gibbs, after having been advised by movant of the esculpatory nature of their potential testimony. We affirm.

Movant was convicted by a jury on the charges of robbery first degree and armed criminal action. He was sentenced to serve concurrent terms of ten years and three years on these…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Seales v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  3. Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. State v. GrantMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Foster v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Scott v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Kroll v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API