Legal Opinion

Glidewell v. Q.O. K.C.R.R. Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 1921PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for personal injuries brought under the Federal Employers Liability Act. Plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment in the sum of $4000 and defendant has appealed. This is the second appeal in the case. [See Glidewell v. Q.O. K.C.R.R. Co., 204 S.W. 37.]

On January 31, 1916, plaintiff was in the employ of the defendant as a blacksmith at its roundhouse located at Milan, Missouri. On that day plaintiff was engaged in shortening a heavy piece of iron called a drawbar, which weighed about 200 pounds and was used to connect one of defendant's engines and tender. The shortening of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Manes v. St. Louis, San Francisco Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tash v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  2. Harlan v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  3. Howard v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  4. Sailor v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API