Legal Opinion

Tash v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 16, 1934PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff was employed by the defendant railway company, at Monett, Missouri, as "an engine hostler." In the course of that employment he was injured and brought this action, under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, for damages, for the injuries sustained. A verdict for plaintiff was returned, and judgment entered thereon, assessing damages at the sum of $8000 and defendant has appealed. The applicability of the Federal Employers' Liability Act is not challenged.

Appellant's first contention is that its demurrer to the evidence should have been sustained and that the trial court erred in…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gila Valley, Globe & Northern Railway Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Toledo, St. Louis & Western Railroad v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. ProffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Hogan v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
  5. Laughlin v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1918

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Guthrie v. City of St. CharlesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  2. Joice v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945
  3. Goslin v. KurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
  4. Harrington v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  5. Oesterle v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API