Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
After defendants removed a state court foreclosure action to federal district court, plaintiff filed a motion to remand. The district court granted the motion and, pursuant to its discretion under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c), awarded plaintiff attorney fees and costs incurred as a result of the removal. On appeal, defendants argue that the district court abused its discretion to award fees and costs to plaintiff. Because defendants’ removal action lacked an objectively reasonable basis, we affirm.
I
On January 29, 2003, Defendant Deme-trious Smith purchased residential property…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Thompson Ex Rel. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Rivet v. Regions Bank of LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Wisconsin v. Amgen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Leys v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
- Geffen v. General Electric Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Schilmiller v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2014
- 3w International, Inc. v. Scottdel, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2010
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.