Pottash v. Director General of Railroads
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County
1Opinion of the Court
Martin, P. J.,
An action of assumpsit was instituted by plaintiffs to recover from defendant, a terminal carrier, compensation for damages to a shipment of burlap received by the initial carrier in good condition, but delivered to plaintiffs by the terminal carrier wet and stained with paint.
During the trial plaintiffs were allowed to amend the record by adding the Christian and surnames “William G. McAdoo” to the title of defendant “Director General of Railroads.”
On behalf of plaintiffs, there was offered in evidence a bill of lading issued by the initial carrier, reciting that the property…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dalmas v. KembleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Wray, Moore & Co. v. American Ry. Ex. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
- Howard v. American Express Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911