Pinto v. Aberthaw Construction Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.
At issue in this case is the division between an insurer’s attorney and an employee’s attorney of an attor*495nev’s fee set aside from an employee’s recovery in excess of the insurer’s lien in a workers’ compensation action brought by the insurer’s attorneys pursuant to the third-party provisions of G. L. c. 152, § 15 (1992 ed.). After a hearing, a judge in the Superior Court awarded the entire $29,000 fee to the insurer’s attorneys, the law firm of McCormack & Epstein. We granted McCormack & Epstein’s application for further appellate review after the Appeals Court, 35 Mass. App. Ct. 253 (1993),…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fontaine v. Ebtec Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- DaRoza v. ArterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Hunter v. Midwest Coast Transport, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
- Bongiorno v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
- Gagnon v. ShoblomMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Horner v. Boston Edison Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- In re Volkswagen & Audi Warranty Extension LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- City of Malden v. AntonangelliMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1995
- Goodrich v. Cequent Performance Products, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Beechin v. United States Mineral Products Co.Massachusetts Superior Court · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.