Legal Opinion

City of Malden v. Antonangelli

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided November 8, 1995PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtFurnari, J.

This is an action by the City of Malden (“the City”) to recover an $8,773.70 balance in reimbursement for G.L.c. 41, §111F compensation paid to the defendant which was allegedly owed to the City following the defendant’s settlement of his claim against a third-party tortfeasor. The defendant contended that the amount in question constituted the City’s proportionate share of attorney’s fees incurred by the defendant in the settlement of his tort claim, and was thus properly deducted from his G.L.c. 41, §111F reimbursement to the City. Judgment was entered for the defendant, and the City filed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wormstead v. Town Manager of SaugusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. David J. Tierney, Jr., Inc. v. T. Wellington Carpets, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  3. DiGloria v. Chief of Police of MethuenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
  4. Eyssi v. City of LawrenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  5. Hunter v. Midwest Coast Transport, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kubik v. StreuleMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API