Legal Opinion

The Procter & Gamble U.S. Business Services Company v. Estate of Jefffrey Rolison

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 2024No. 3:17-cv-00762Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA THE PROCTOR & GAMBLE U.S. BUSINESS SERVICES COMPANY, As Plan Administrator And On Behalf Of The Procter & Gamble Profit Sharing Trust and Employee Stock Ownership Plan, et al., Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:17-CV-00762 v. (MEHALCHICK, J.) ESTATE OF JEFFREY ROLISON, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM Procter & Gamble (“P&G”) filed this lawsuit under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)

29 U. S. C. §§ 1001

et. seq. as plan administrator on behalf of The Procter & Gamble Profit-Sharing Trust and Employee Stock Ownership Plan…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Susan Farrell v. Planters Lifesavers Company Nabisco, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API