Legal Opinion

Wallace v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 1, 1996No. C-91-309, PC-95-1246PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DISCOVERY

Petitioner George Kent Wallace through his attorney, Randy A. Bauman, has filed two documents with this Court: an Emergency Application for Stay of Execution; and an Initial Motion for Discovery. We granted the application for stay of execution in a separate Order filed November 21,1995, and determined that order was an extension of proceedings in connection with this Court’s mandatory sentence review of his conviction. For that reason we reference that case number in the style of this case. We now address the Motion for Discovery. For the reasons given below, we find…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jordan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
  2. McCullick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. State Ex Rel. Hicks v. FreemanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1990

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. YoungCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Wallace v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. Lambert v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. State ex rel. Mashburn v. SticeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
  5. State v. AndersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API