Legal Opinion

In re Chachkers

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lewis R. Friedman, J.

During this proceeding for the appointment of a guardian pursuant to the new Mental Hygiene Law article 81 an important procedural issue has emerged which has not been addressed in the reported cases under article 81, or its predecessors (Mental Hygiene Law former arts 77, 78). This case presents the question of whether an article 81 proceeding may be discontinued before an evidentiary hearing.

Petitioner, the Director of Social Services of New York University Medical Center, sought the appointment of a guardian of the person and property of Shirley W.,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sengstack v. SengstackNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. Wurster v. . ArmfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  3. In re Rochester General HospitalNew York Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Broder v. BroderNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. In re ForwardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Kurt T.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. 55th Management Corp. v. GoldmanNew York Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API