Legal Opinion

Broder v. Broder

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1983PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order affirmed, with costs, and the question certified answered in the affirmative. No complaint or responsive pleading ever having been served or filed in the action commenced in 1979, plaintiff was within her rights to discontinue that action by notice. (CPLR 3217, subd [a], par 1; Battaglia v Battaglia, 59 NY2d 778.)

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Battaglia v. BattagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. KindorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Giambrone v. GiambroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Mamet v. MametAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. McMahon v. McMahonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. McKean v. McKeanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API