Legal Opinion

Hamilton Nat. Bank v. Haynes

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1943PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

On September 18, 1941, Nellie H. Jennings’ will was probated in the County Court of Knox County and the Hamilton National Bank qualified as executor and trustee. The testatrix directed her executor and trustee to use her entire estate, consisting of approximately $300',000, for the care of her husband, James W. Jennings, during his lifetime. The residue was bequeathed to a number of persons and two charitable institutions. James W. Jennings survived the testatrix for only two months. On September 29, 1941, P. B. Jennings, a brother of James W. Jennings, qualified as his guardian in the County…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Van Steenwyck v. WashburnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Collins v. CarmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
  3. First Natl. Bk. of St. Petersburg v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  4. In re Estate of ConnorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  5. Bowers v. M'GavockTennessee Supreme Court · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hartt v. HarttWyoming Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Hamilton National Bank of Knoxville, of the Estate of John Edd Bradley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  3. Pinkerton v. TurmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Jenkins v. BorodofskyMississippi Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Manufacturers Bank & Trust Co. v. KundaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API