Legal Opinion
National Association of Home Builders v. Salazar
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 8, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2010-0832PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge.
Plaintiff National Association of Home Builders (“NAHB”) brings this suit against Defendants, Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar (the “Secretary”) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”), for declaratory and injunctive relief, pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq., and the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. § 1540(g). NAHB challenges the validity of a memorandum drafted by the Solicitor of the Department of the Interior that interprets a phrase in the definitions of “endangered species”…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Preiser v. NewkirkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Colorado River Cutthroat Trout v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Clean Water Action v. PruittCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Whitney v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Clean Water Action v. PruittDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018