Legal Opinion

United States v. Roger Worthy, United States of America v. Oscar Delane Simpkins

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 30, 1990No. 89-9009, 89-9016PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FAY, Circuit Judge:

This case presents the question of whether the defendants’ act of burning a cross in the yard of a black neighbor constitutes the use of fire in the commission of a federal felony, for purposes of application of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. We hold that it does.

Factual and Procedural History

Defendants Roger R. Worthy and Oscar D. Simpkins entered plea agreements whereby they pled guilty to identical one-count informations charging them with conspiracy to interfere with civil rights under 18 U.S.C. § 241. Both defendants were charged for their participation in a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miller v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States v. Willie Frank GoolsbyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. Dennis HarotunianCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Joe Luis SaucedoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. Kenneth T. Hayward, and William B. Krause, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Gary F. Epley, Ronald J. Pike, and James GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API