Legal Opinion
McQuaid v. United Wholesale Aluminum Supply Co.
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 7, 1976No. 952, September Term, 1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOrth, C. J.
We hold in this case that a judgment of non pros rendered against a party asserting a claim at law because of his failure to comply with the requirements as to time allowed for pleading is not a bar to the filing of another suit based on the same cause of action.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On 20 December 1974 Phillip Tyson McQuaid, appellant, instituted an action at law in the Circuit Court for Baltimore •County by the filing of a declaration seeking damages from United Wholesale Aluminum Supply Co., Inc. and Sidney Pomer, appellees, for false imprisonment (count one) and malicious prosecution…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sterling v. Local 438, Liberty Ass'n of Steam & Power Pipe Fitters & Helpers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1955
- Williams v. Snyder, Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Travelers Insur. Co. v. GodseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Missler v. Anne Arundel CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Frontier Van Lines, Inc. v. Maryland Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Walko Corp. v. Burger Chef Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Colonial Carpets, Inc. v. Carpet Fair, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- State v. ArmstrongCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980