Curry v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Indictment for arson; from Berrien superior court — Judge Thomas. May 15, 1915.
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, J.
The sixth headnote alone needs elaboration. It is insisted by counsel for the plaintiff in error that when two defendants charged with a felony, not a capital felony, are being jointly tried, counsel for the defendants are entitled to two hours argument of the case. Counsel cite rulings of the Supreme Court (Cruce v. State, 59 Ga. 83; Cumming v. State, 99 Ga. 662 (27 S. E. 177); Butler v. State, 92 Ga. 601 (19 S. E. 51); Rawlins v. State, 124 Ga. 48 (52 S. E. 1)), to the effect that in such a case *379each defendant is entitled to twenty peremptory strikes, and insist that it follows that as the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rawlins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Cumming v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Lynn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Cason v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Terhune v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Rutledge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Opatut v. Guest Pond Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Austin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
- Gaulden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.