Legal Opinion

Mekiana v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided October 11, 1985No. A-268PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Chief Judge.

This appeal presents the question of whether notice and an opportunity for a hearing are required before a sentencing court can refuse to set aside the conviction of a defendant who has successfully completed probation following a suspended imposition of sentence. We conclude that the defendant is entitled to prior notice and an opportunity for a hearing on the set-aside issue.

On January 19, 1978, Kenny Mekiana was convicted of assault with a dangerous weapon, in violation of former AS 11.15.-220. Superior Court Judge Jay Hodges suspended the imposition of Mekiana’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Trumbly v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Larson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Journey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Gundersen v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988
  3. Wickham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1989
  4. State v. MekianaAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Wickham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API