Legal Opinion

United States v. Van Hoose

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided July 21, 1981No. ACM 22887PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

POWELL, Senior Judge:

We decide that sexually oriented magazines, devices and information written on a piece of paper, found during an authorized and lawful search for marijuana and related paraphernalia, were not legally seizable under the “plain view” doctrine. There was no probable cause to believe at the time of seizure that the items seized were evidence of any crime. Therefore, the materials, as well as testimony of two witnesses derived from the information seized, were inadmissible in evidence at the accused’s court-martial. We dismiss four specifications, affirm eight…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Stanley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. CeccoliniSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. WoodyardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. NealUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1994
  3. United States v. DagenaisU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
  4. United States v. ElandU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1983
  5. United States v. SimpsonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API