Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 2017No. ED 105107PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhilip M. Hess, Judge

Introduction

Jeffrey Hill (“Movant”) appeals the judgment of circuit court of Franklin County denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for three reasons: 1) failing to object when Victim testified Movant had attacked other family members in the past; 2) failing to argue before the trial court that the rule of lenity barred his conviction for second-degree domestic assault; and 3) submitting the incorrect jury instruction for third-degree domestic assault. Finding no error, we affirm.

Factual Background

Movant was charged with…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. TokarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  3. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  4. McLaughlin v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  5. Soto v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Moss v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. State of Missouri v. Sequoi D. EdwardsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Yaeger v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. BRANDY B. SHADDOX, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025
  5. Coleman v. RameyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API