Hill v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtPhilip M. Hess, Judge
Introduction
Jeffrey Hill (“Movant”) appeals the judgment of circuit court of Franklin County denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for three reasons: 1) failing to object when Victim testified Movant had attacked other family members in the past; 2) failing to argue before the trial court that the rule of lenity barred his conviction for second-degree domestic assault; and 3) submitting the incorrect jury instruction for third-degree domestic assault. Finding no error, we affirm.
Factual Background
Movant was charged with…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. TokarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- McLaughlin v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Soto v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Moss v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- State of Missouri v. Sequoi D. EdwardsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Yaeger v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- BRANDY B. SHADDOX, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025
- Coleman v. RameyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.