Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Koopman v. Waukesha Co. Ct. Judges

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1968PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

Defendant made application for the writ of prohibition in order to determine whether criminal proceedings could be instituted against him because he was over the age of eighteen at the time of his arrest, notwithstanding that he was under eighteen at the time of the alleged offenses. The state contends, however, that *495this issue cannot be reached because no basis has been established for the issuance of the writ.

The court is here faced with the traditional use of the writ of prohibition, which has been to keep an inferior court from acting outside its jurisdiction when there was no adequate…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Slatton v. BolesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State Ex Rel. Gaynon v. KruegerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State Ex Rel. Klinkiewicz v. DuffyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. State v. SchollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  5. State ex rel. Kiekhaefer v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. In INTEREST OF DH v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. State v. AnnalaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. MannsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Miller v. QuatsoeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API