Legal Opinion
State v. Becker
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided December 14, 1976No. 75-723-CRPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
The facts are not disputed. There was sufficient evidence to convict Darrell Becker of the unlawful delivery of amphetamines, contrary to sec. 161.41(1) (b), Stats., and the unlawful delivery of a counterfeit controlled substance, contrary to sec. 161.41 (2m).
The only question is whether the circuit court had jurisdiction, under the facts of this case, to try Becker when the delivery of the substances was made by Becker when he was seventeen years of age but the charge was brought after he attained the age of eighteen.
State ex rel. Koopman v. Waukesha County Court Judges, 38 Wis.2d 492, 157…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State Ex Rel. Koopman v. Waukesha Co. Ct. JudgesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Miller v. QuatsoeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1972
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. AnnalaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. AveryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. VelezWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MannsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.