Legal Opinion
American Mining Congress v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided April 25, 1990No. Nos. 88-1040, 88-1041PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2239(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 2342(4), the American Mining Congress (No. 88-1040) and Quivira Mining Company, Kerr-McGee Chemical Corporation and Homestake Mining Company of California (No. 88-1041) seek judicial review of certain amendments to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s “Criteria Relating to the Operation of Uranium Mills and the Disposition of Tailings or Waste Produced by the Extraction or Concentration of Source Material from Ores Processed Primarily for Their Source Material Content.” The “Criteria” are published at 10 C.F.R. Part 40,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- California v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- American Mining Congress v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- American Mining Congress v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Quivira Mining Co v. United States Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- American Mining Congress v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of America, Quivira Mining Company, Kerr-Mcgee Chemical Corporation, and Homestake Mining Company of California v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Environmental Defense Fund v. United States Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990