Legal Opinion

American Mining Congress v. Thomas

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided September 3, 1985No. Nos. 83-2226, 83-2227, 83-2277, 83-2504, 83-2524, 84-1349, 84-1352, 84-1482 and 84-1908PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOGAN, Circuit Judge.

I

These consolidated cases involve challenges to the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) standards governing stabilization and control of byproduct materials, primarily mill tailings, at licensed commercial uranium and thorium processing sites (the active mill sites). The EPA established these standards pursuant to its authority under the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978 (UMTRCA), as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2022 and 7901-7942, the same statute that required the EPA to promulgate standards applicable to the inactive mill sites. With the exception of No.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Federal Communications Commission v. ITT World Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ash Creek Mining Co. v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  2. Riggs v. City of AlbuquerqueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  3. American Mining Congress v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  4. Wyoming ex rel. Sullivan v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. Quivira Mining Co v. United States Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API