Tamte v. Eddy

This case is governed by Meyers v. Knott, 144 Minn. 199, 174 N. W. 842, 843, and State ex rel. Wenzel v. May, 190 Minn. 336, 251 N. W. 529. In Meyers v. Knott we used language which controls decision here [144 Minn. 203]:

“Under the charter of the city of Minneapolis the mayor is given the power of veto of legislative enactments passed and adopted by the city council, and the veto when used annuls the enactment, unless subsequently repassed by the council by a two-thirds vote of its members. * * * To hold that the veto power of the mayor must be taken into account, and a proposed franchise…