Legal Opinion
People v. Izsak
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided May 21, 1979PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Luis M. Ñeco, J.
The above defendants were each, individually, charged with patronizing a prostitute (Penal Law, § 230.03). Each defendant has sought relief in the form of dismissal in the interests of justice pursuant to CPL 170.40. The court has sought to combine the motions for the sake of simplicity.
The factual situations are as follows:
Defendant Izsak allegedly patronized a decoy police officer posing as a prostitute. The defendant states he is an alien, married, with a six-year-old child. He claims he was somewhat intoxicated. He is gainfully employed and has…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- People v. SelikoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Lynch v. OverholserSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- People v. ClaytonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. WilliamsCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1983
- People v. BaileyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1981
- People v. LinkCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1981
- People v. StateikinCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1994