Edward Finley v. James Cox
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
In these companion appeals, Nevada state prisoners Edward Finley and Leodi-as Edwards appeal pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of the First Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment, and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”) arising from the denial of pre-packaged kosher meals. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Guatay Christian Fellowship v. County of San Diego, 670 F.3d 957, 970 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm.
The district court properly granted summary judgment on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Padgett v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Shakur v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Freeman v. ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Clarence Jones v. Max WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- gator.com Corp. v. L.L. Bean, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.