Legal Opinion

Langworthy v. Department of Corrections

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 1991No. Docket No. 123998PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner, an inmate in respondent’s custody, was given a major misconduct citation for his refusal to submit to a urine test. He then petitioned for judicial review in the Ingham Circuit Court. Upon review, the circuit court concluded that respondent’s administrative finding was supported by competent, material, and substantial evidence. Petitioner now appeals as of right. We affirm.

Petitioner first argues that the decision of the circuit court is clearly erroneous in that he was found guilty of "substance abuse” where there is no evidence of any substance. We disagree.

The circuit court…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Joe Dwyer, Inc v. Jaguar Cars, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Campbell v. Marquette Prison WardenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wells v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Martin v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Lewis v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Wells v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API