Legal Opinion

United States v. Portland Cement Company of Utah, a Utah Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 12, 1963No. 7028PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

Portland Cement Company of Utah, a so-called miner-manufacturer, sought in this action to recover refund of income taxes paid for the years 1954, 1955, and 1956. Legal right to the refund was asserted on the ground that the base for depletion allowance of the taxpayer was sales of finished cement, not a certain kind of limestone. Judgment was entered for the taxpayer. On appeal, the judgment was reversed and the cause was remanded for a new trial. United States v. Portland Cement Company of Utah, 10 Cir., 293 F.2d 826. The cause was again tried, evidence was adduced,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Cannelton Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Riddell v. Monolith Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. R. A. Riddell, District Director of Internal Revenue, Los Angeles District v. Monolith Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  4. United States v. Portland Cement Company of Utah, a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Portland Cement Company of Utah, a Utah Corporation, Portland Cement Company of Utah, a Utah Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  2. United States v. Longhorn Portland Cement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
  3. United States v. Portland Cement Company of UtahCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  4. Portland Cement Company of Utah, a Utah Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  5. Iowa Limestone Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API